2003 G AAA changes and openings

Post a reply


By clicking the box you agree you are human and have read and will abide by Posting Rules, Terms of Use and Your Information when posting or using this website
Smilies
:D :) ;) :( :o :shock: :? 8-) :lol: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :twisted: :roll: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen: :geek: :ugeek:

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: 2003 G AAA changes and openings

Re: 2003 G AAA changes and openings

Post by Guest » Mon Jan 16, 2017 11:42 pm

The other parent offered spots by Jrc must be thrilled to hear about this

Re: 2003 G AAA changes and openings

Post by Guest » Mon Jan 16, 2017 11:21 pm

Okay let's just put this out there and hope some smart, reasonable adults understand...

there is absolutely no way that any player should have a free ride at any time
all pay to share the costs of the team and ensure that the budget applies equally to all

if you are in a situation where kids play for free ask yourself why and then go out and buy a "I'm a Sucker" t-shirt

It is clear that some kids are a little more talented than others (and who cares really?) but that is no excuse for why you knowingly let it happen to you

what is the coach saying when he grants a player a free ride for 8K and then you carry the load - shouldn't the coach at least have the integrity to buy a "I'm a Sucker" shirt for the rest of the team dads?

Re: 2003 G AAA changes and openings

Post by Guest » Mon Jan 16, 2017 8:44 pm

Rebs lucky twins didn't play

Re: 2003 G AAA changes and openings

Post by Guest » Mon Jan 16, 2017 6:01 pm

More free
Rides on trw

Re: 2003 G AAA changes and openings

Post by Guest » Mon Jan 16, 2017 5:46 pm

That is true............ free rides everywhere on JRC

Re: 2003 G AAA changes and openings

Post by Guest » Mon Jan 16, 2017 5:34 pm

How many free rides is JRC giving out??? Heard they offered Kitch kid free RIDE???? Begging him to come back

Re: 2003 G AAA changes and openings

Post by Guest » Mon Jan 16, 2017 5:23 pm

Nats are actually probably the only team with no drama. Added one, dropped none. Put all your hatred for DDM aside and ask yourself can any other teams say the same? Look high and wide but your answer will still be "no"

Re: 2003 G AAA changes and openings

Post by Guest » Mon Jan 16, 2017 5:18 pm

Guest wrote:DDM wanted BL back from the Marlies once they kicked him to the curb. lol...lol


Which fwds coming In @ YN?

Re: 2003 G AAA changes and openings

Post by Guest » Mon Jan 16, 2017 4:47 pm

DDM wanted BL back from the Marlies once they kicked him to the curb. lol...lol

Re: 2003 G AAA changes and openings

Post by Guest » Mon Jan 16, 2017 4:07 pm

DD shopping for goalie but no luck, wanted SM badly, and it is also true that Nat parents whisper about their goaltending costing them at big times.

Re: 2003 G AAA changes and openings

Post by Guest » Mon Jan 16, 2017 3:46 pm

Nats aren't shopping goalies. Both coming back. Stir elsewhere.

Re: 2003 G AAA changes and openings

Post by Guest » Mon Jan 16, 2017 3:38 pm

Guest wrote:
Guest wrote:God you are stupid....."without a doubt" ? Really?

Both played 26 league games against identical competition. DMF have let in a total of 29 goal in.....the Nats have let a total of 23 goals in. I'm not sure I would say that DMF has an advantage in any way or form.

You might even say, well Nats play a more defensive brand of hockey so that is why their goals against is so low. Well guess again buddy? DMF has scored 124 goals.....the Nats sit at 132.

Don't you hate it when true stats prove you weak comments wrong.



If the Nats goaltending is so great, why is your coach shopping around for a replacement and why do your parents continue to bash the ones you have, it's no secret how the parent feel.


All teams shopping around genius.
All positions. You new to this?

Re: 2003 G AAA changes and openings

Post by Guest » Mon Jan 16, 2017 3:18 pm

Guest wrote:God you are stupid....."without a doubt" ? Really?

Both played 26 league games against identical competition. DMF have let in a total of 29 goal in.....the Nats have let a total of 23 goals in. I'm not sure I would say that DMF has an advantage in any way or form.

You might even say, well Nats play a more defensive brand of hockey so that is why their goals against is so low. Well guess again buddy? DMF has scored 124 goals.....the Nats sit at 132.

Don't you hate it when true stats prove you weak comments wrong.



If the Nats goaltending is so great, why is your coach shopping around for a replacement and why do your parents continue to bash the ones you have, it's no secret how the parent feel.

Re: 2003 G AAA changes and openings

Post by Guest » Mon Jan 16, 2017 3:09 pm

Guest wrote:
Guest wrote:Rebels tough, hard hitting game was too much for DMF to handle. Old time LD hockey.


Was everybody playing for DMF and who was in net?

RP in net

Re: 2003 G AAA changes and openings

Post by Change » Mon Jan 16, 2017 3:01 pm

Top Reb player going to the Big Blue, book it.

Re: 2003 G AAA changes and openings

Post by Guest » Mon Jan 16, 2017 3:00 pm

Guest wrote:God you are stupid....."without a doubt" ? Really?

Both played 26 league games against identical competition. DMF have let in a total of 29 goal in.....the Nats have let a total of 23 goals in. I'm not sure I would say that DMF has an advantage in any way or form.

You might even say, well Nats play a more defensive brand of hockey so that is why their goals against is so low. Well guess again buddy? DMF has scored 124 goals.....the Nats sit at 132.

Don't you hate it when true stats prove you weak comments wrong.


Umm no the games count not the stats. Nats win o e game with 1 second left wow. Get smoked in the tournament and lose the championship. Those are what count. Honestly though 5 years

Re: 2003 G AAA changes and openings

Post by Guest » Mon Jan 16, 2017 2:48 pm

By the way, Big Blue has scored 86 goals.....substantially less that both. They have also let in 38 goals.....again, higher than the big two

Re: 2003 G AAA changes and openings

Post by Guest » Mon Jan 16, 2017 2:48 pm

Hey JRC, I know it's been a disappointing year. Many of you are used to past glories so it's been like eating humble pie but your team has been playing way better lately. Don't be so stressed out at games and please tell some of your parents to put a sock in it.

Re: 2003 G AAA changes and openings

Post by Guest » Mon Jan 16, 2017 2:46 pm

God you are stupid....."without a doubt" ? Really?

Both played 26 league games against identical competition. DMF have let in a total of 29 goal in.....the Nats have let a total of 23 goals in. I'm not sure I would say that DMF has an advantage in any way or form.

You might even say, well Nats play a more defensive brand of hockey so that is why their goals against is so low. Well guess again buddy? DMF has scored 124 goals.....the Nats sit at 132.

Don't you hate it when true stats prove you weak comments wrong.

Re: 2003 G AAA changes and openings

Post by Guest » Mon Jan 16, 2017 2:45 pm

I pick DMF because ...... because Nats haven't won anything in 5 years

Top