Alliance AAA 2002

Post a reply


By clicking the box you agree you are human and have read and will abide by Posting Rules, Terms of Use and Your Information when posting or using this website
Smilies
:D :) ;) :( :o :shock: :? 8-) :lol: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :twisted: :roll: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen: :geek: :ugeek:

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: Alliance AAA 2002

Re: Alliance AAA 2002

Post by Guest » Sat Jul 22, 2017 7:53 pm

Waterloo's AA team would beat the AAA team this year. An off year for a program that is usually strong.

Re: Alliance AAA 2002

Post by Guest » Sat Jul 22, 2017 11:18 am

LJK
West
No improvement
Done nothing yet, way behind other teams
Still finish top 4

Re: Alliance AAA 2002

Post by Guest » Sat Jul 22, 2017 8:49 am

Guest wrote:Anyone skating yet?
Has your team improved?
East- ?
West-?

How has your team improved the most
Front or back end


No.
Just as disappointing as last year.
West.
Both lack talent.

How bout your kid's team?

Re: Alliance AAA 2002

Post by Guest » Sat Jul 22, 2017 7:23 am

Anyone skating yet?
Has your team improved?
East- ?
West-?

How has your team improved the most
Front or back end

Re: Alliance AAA 2002

Post by Guest » Fri Jul 14, 2017 3:57 pm

Guest wrote:No East or West in Minor Midget. Only 1 division this year.


Lol.... Somebody has been doing there homework! Also 3 game series this year with every team...

Re: Alliance AAA 2002

Post by Guest » Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 pm

No East or West in Minor Midget. Only 1 division this year.

Re: Alliance AAA 2002

Post by Guest » Fri Jul 14, 2017 8:35 am

Lambton ahead of EMC?

Re: Alliance AAA 2002

Post by Guest » Fri Jul 14, 2017 7:40 am

no way LJK finishes 5th in west. they have the best defense in the league
they will finish 1st or 2nd in west. agree SC will be strong.

Re: Alliance AAA 2002

Post by Guest » Thu Jul 13, 2017 11:43 pm

West predictions
Sc
Chatam
Windsor
Lambton
Ljk
Chiefs

Book it

Re: Alliance AAA 2002

Post by Guest » Thu Jul 13, 2017 9:07 am

You need to add KJR to that list.

Re: Alliance AAA 2002

Post by Guest » Thu Jul 13, 2017 9:04 am

Teams that will provide the most entertainment parent watching are CH, LJK and EMC

Re: Alliance AAA 2002

Post by Guest » Wed Jul 12, 2017 10:01 pm

Waterloo seem's to have Cambridge's number. Year after year. Look at the scores. Watch out for Hpl too. Don't laugh. They have some big tough talented farm boys.

Re: Alliance AAA 2002

Post by Guest » Wed Jul 12, 2017 4:58 pm

Guest wrote:There's more parity in the league now than ever before.
This will be a dog fight not a runaway train.
Cambridge was good because they bought in to the system. They flipped kids now they have to start over. If those new kids don't buy in, the team is doomed.
The team with the least injuries throughout the year will win.

No one really cares who wins this year
Players are looking to play there best and get drafted
Bouncing around on teams means nothing more than extra expenses
There really isn't anything free about free rides
Scouts already know who is who
I'm sure there are top round picks outside the "G"

Re: Alliance AAA 2002

Post by Guest » Tue Jul 11, 2017 2:14 pm

There's more parity in the league now than ever before.
This will be a dog fight not a runaway train.
Cambridge was good because they bought in to the system. They flipped kids now they have to start over. If those new kids don't buy in, the team is doomed.
The team with the least injuries throughout the year will win.

Re: Alliance AAA 2002

Post by Guest » Tue Jul 11, 2017 2:01 pm

Re: Alliance AAA 2002
Postby Guest » Tue Jul 11, 2017 12:08 pm

Guest wrote:
A lot of teams including Hamilton have under achieved the last few years..EMC, LJK, SC and Waterloo are either going backwards or standing still...Cambridge has improved at a pretty steady pace while CK and HPL have shown the ability to make games at least interesting more times than not...who knows this year with all the player movement that went down...need to get to 1/3 pt of the season to figure who the winners and losers are

Well said and I totally agree. You make some good points. The combination of top players and coaching will make Cambridge unbeatable down the stretch especially when injuries and suspensions come into play late in the season. If and when the Alliance approves all the funny business Cambridge will be the team to beat.

So who challenges CH?

Re: Alliance AAA 2002

Post by Guest » Tue Jul 11, 2017 12:25 pm

Guest wrote:So do the chances of winning increase with better coaching or with better players?


Mix of both. IF you have the best 20 players in the league, anyone can coach them, if you have the worst 20 players in the league, it doesn't matter who is coaching, they won't win.

End of the day Mike Babcock could be coaching the year after he won a Stanley Cup and parents will still complain, because that's what Minor Hockey parents do.

Re: Alliance AAA 2002

Post by Guest » Tue Jul 11, 2017 12:08 pm

Guest wrote:A lot of teams including Hamilton have under achieved the last few years..EMC, LJK, SC and Waterloo are either going backwards or standing still...Cambridge has improved at a pretty steady pace while CK and HPL have shown the ability to make games at least interesting more times than not...who knows this year with all the player movement that went down...need to get to 1/3 pt of the season to figure who the winners and losers are

Well said and I totally agree. You make some good points. The combination of top players and coaching will make Cambridge unbeatable down the stretch especially when injuries and suspensions come into play late in the season. If and when the Alliance approves all the funny business Cambridge will be the team to beat.

Re: Alliance AAA 2002

Post by Guest » Tue Jul 11, 2017 11:14 am

A lot of teams including Hamilton have under achieved the last few years..EMC, LJK, SC and Waterloo are either going backwards or standing still...Cambridge has improved at a pretty steady pace while CK and HPL have shown the ability to make games at least interesting more times than not...who knows this year with all the player movement that went down...need to get to 1/3 pt of the season to figure who the winners and losers are

Re: Alliance AAA 2002

Post by Guest » Tue Jul 11, 2017 10:57 am

Guest wrote:So do the chances of winning increase with better coaching or with better players?

ask hamilton that question. They certainly underachieved the last four years

Re: Alliance AAA 2002

Post by Guest » Tue Jul 11, 2017 9:54 am

So do the chances of winning increase with better coaching or with better players?

Top